Michael Wilkes

Liberal Democrat Councillor for Hall Green ward

Archive for the ‘Local Issues’

Published March 24th, 2008

Rising from the ashes!

phoenmyd.jpg

The loss of Highfield House has been a massive blow to the residents of Hall Green. But directly as a result of that, a new group has been brought together to ensure that the loss of historic buildings is not such an easy ride for grasping developers and compliant planners.

In Hall Green our heritage is vitally important to us and we will fight to protect it. This goes for other parts of the city too - as our courageous colleagues in Moseley have shown.

The new body is to be called the Hall Green Preservation Group. HGPG had its inaugural meeting on 20th March at Hall Green Library. Many local people turned out and signed up to the principal of a preservation group that is to be proactive rather than reactive. All of your Focus team have signed up. If you are interested in taking part, contact Councillor Paula Smith on 0121-778-6679 or Councillor Michael Wilkes on 0121-777-2462 or email Michael directly from here.

We will work hard, side by side with residents to protect all the history we have left in and near Hall Green so future generations can enjoy the environment, both built and natural, that we have today.

Published March 23rd, 2008

We should not stand for these charges

The costs of energy are taking increasing chunks out of family incomes. Since privatisation, the power companies have ruthlessly exploited their position. They hike costs for low energy users even more than their huge headline increases - up to 50% more. This is effectively a standing charge with the first kilowatts being priced even higher than the rest.

“People on modest fixed incomes are being hit hard,” said Councillor Michael Wilkes. “Pensioners, other modest energy users and those trying to do their bit for the environment should be aided not penalised. And with the likes of BT increasing their take from those who don’t want to hand over their bank details and rising ‘line rentals’ - another standing charge - the problem is made worse. These anti-social money grabbers would be brought to book by a government worth its salt.”

Published March 18th, 2008

That Which Was Lost

pic005mc.jpg

Just a few weeks after the first of the public demonstrations of support for retaining Highfield House, bitterness was tinged with sadness for local residents as the Planning Committee voted to approve the application to build flats and houses at 187 Highfield Road and demolish the historic house. “The committee should be ashamed of themselves,” said Councillor Michael Wilkes. “Nobody wants this apart from the developers, planning officers (who again recommended approval) and those councillors who voted for it. If I never see another planning officer in Hall Green it will be too soon,” he continued.

“Despite passionate appeals from Liberal Democrat members, who all voted against, the Conservatives, belying their name, all voted in favour, two Labour members voted in favour and the rest of them abstained. In our view, members have a moral duty to support the public interest. If they do not, what is the purpose of being an elected representative?” Ward colleague Councillor Paula Smith said: “Local people fought very hard to preserve this house. It is a very sad sign of the times that we see yet more of our history thrown away for the sake of profit”. Cllr Jackie Hawthorn commented: “There are those in positions of power who have learnt nothing from the mistakes of the 1960s. The decision is lamentable.”

Your councillors are now setting up the Hall Green Preservation Group that will seek to protect and list all our remaining historic buildings so that the tragedy of Highfield House will never be repeated. This is essential. A malign circus has developed. A locally significant property, long cared for, is sold for ‘development’ either because the owners die and offspring don’t have the same values or, as with Highfield House, the managers of a Housing Association do not hold to traditional values. First the garden is destroyed with trees cut down - in the case of Highfield House a stand of poplars and a rare variety of apple of Victorian vintage - and a proper environmental assessment rendered impossible. The condition of the property then rapidly and mysteriously deteriorates - one can only wonder how. Meanwhile the target besotted Government threatens penalties for failure to grant planning approvals at a rate of knots and continues to ensure that the law, weak as it is, is biased in favour of developers. Planning officers, fearful of possible legal costs of standing up for the community and heedless of the extent of public feeling, disregard their own conservation advice and recommend approval. Local listing, with its feeble penalties, is seen to be worthless. The majority of members on the Planning Committee then, perhaps after crocodile tears, lamely comply and reward the developer with approval. Yet another building - in the present case, Highfield House with a unique and intriguing history - is then torn down to be replaced by yet more high density flats and housing.

Despite the clear moral obligation on elected members to fight for their constituents, Lib-Dem Councillors striving to cut through this malign circle are said to be ‘stirring it up’ or, as in a nearby ward, are even threatened with the Standards Committee for exposing another case of startling deterioration suffered by a historic building. “It is not just our history that is being lost but our very identity as communities,” said Councillor Wilkes. “We must show this up for what it is and marshal our communities in defiance”. The associated file, HighHous.pdf, 

highhous.pdf

is a slide show in Adobe Acrobat format and has pictures of the interior of Highfield House just 18 months ago. We could weep for that which was lost.

Published March 8th, 2008

Mark This!

It’s known that properties are sometimes code marked by gang members, often posing as salesmen or representatives, as a way of tipping off fellow criminals of times when a property is empty or where insufficient security may make them vulnerable. A break-in could subsequently occur. Following reports of a house apparently being marked in this way in Tixall Road, local residents may wish to be vigilant.

Councillor Jackie Hawthorn advises: “Have a look around doorways, exterior brickwork and porches for suspicious markings. These may take the form of an arrow, a circle, a wavy line or such like. Check the pavement outside your property too. It should be obvious if marks have been put there by the Council or utility firms. A wire brush should get rid of markings on brickwork or the pavement. Take particular care with your porches and windows. We want our houses to be inviting - but to the right sort of people!”

Published February 23rd, 2008

By Dawn’s Early Light

hhd2comc.jpg

Residents of long standing may recall the ominous ring of this title. But spirits were high when 32 local residents assembled outside Highfield House at 6-45 a.m. one February morning. The occasion was to take part in a live radio broadcast to make clear the public support for the retention of Highfield House.

The house was in very good condition some 18 months ago but, since it has been in the ownership of developers / speculators the once lovely garden has been devastated and the house itself has been allowed to decline. Based on items and photos supplied by several people, Michael Wilkes produced a slide show of the house (if you would like a copy email Michael as Michael.Wilkes@birmingham.gov.uk - it is a 1mb file). “Neglect of a locally listed building is tantamount to vandalism and should not be rewarded with permission to demolish and develop for a maximum haul of money” said Councillor Wilkes. “It shows what can happen when a good house falls into the wrong hands. I spoke at the Planning Committee and submitted five pages of arguments as to why the application should be refused and Councillor Paula Smith worked tirelessly organising the campaign to save the house”.

As ever, the dice are loaded against the general public when it comes to profitable development. Successive governments have done nothing to change this situation and the present lot have made it even worse with their obsession with targets. Hall Green Focus believes that the only target that should count is the preservation of the character of communities. There is nothing wrong with a fair profit (given the point reached we would accept build on the site that preserved the structure of the house) and this could have been done had the will - and or appropriate legislation -been there.

Published February 23rd, 2008

Our own Middle-earth

pic02mc.jpg

The Birmingham Tolkien Group (BTG) which is chaired by Councillor Michael Wilkes continues to work hard to make the most of JRR Tolkien’s close connection with Birmingham and Hall Green in particular. The international popularity of Tolkien remains very high, and in February Michael officially welcomed a group of visitors from Poland who were being shown round Tolkien sites in Birmingham.

Naturally, their first port of call was Sarehole Mill and our picture shows Michael with some members of the visiting party. Volunteers from the Tolkien Weekend group guided the visitors throughout the day, which was very successful and much appreciated.

This year’s Tolkien weekend at Sarehole Mill will be on Saturday 17th and Sunday 18th May and will include a special performance from Shire Productions, the Hall Green based drama group.

Published February 12th, 2008

Highfield House

hhmyc.jpg

Highfield House is one of the oldest houses in Hall Green (the Church of the Ascension, Sarehole Mill and The Bulls Head are older buildings). Developers intentions to demolish and replace with intensive development and the planning officers’ astonishing recommendation to accept, have been greeted with widespread public outrage. The law set by successive governments is heavily biased towards developers (who can appeal against refusal, but the public cannot appeal against consent). But we should be doing all in our power to resist developments that take away the character of our area. And we should stand up for our citizens. We recently persuaded the Planning Committee to defer decision for further conservation advice - the original not being fairly reflected in the report before members. This was my (time limited) statement at the meeting:  “No-one is in favour of this proposal except those who seek to profit from it and some - alas the predominant - planning officers.  I have presented petitions direct to planning and to full council totalling 650 signatures. It is opposed by Hall Green Residents Association and many prominent and distinguished residents.  There is much to object to in this application but I’ve time only to discuss a pivotal element - the existing house. The demolition of Highfield House would be another blow to the character of Hall Green. A guided tour of Hall Green involves all too many statements like:  “On this site there used to be a large house of character…” It is said that information is power. And so is the ability to shape,  control and restrict access to information. Reading what has been put in the report, members could be forgiven for concluding that there’s not a major conservation issue here, but there is.  This was conservation officer advice: This is an important and highly conspicuous Locally Listed building.  The loss of the building is totally contrary to the policies held in the

Birmingham Plan.  It is not only the loss of an impressive and historical building but also a loss to the streetscape value of Highfield Road and a loss of local distinctiveness. The spacious and green nature of the corner site also contributes to the character and appearance of this area. The proposed scheme does not contribute to the area in the same way and destroys all the positive elements about the site. The proposal appears out of context with the surrounding area. Application should be refused. The tenor of this is crystal clear - here we have a building that’s worth preserving. Hard to see how it morphed into what’s stated in the report. Alas, little of Old Hall Green now remains. Highfield House is part of it - that’s why it’s on the Local List. And that’s why the UDP states: “The demolition of buildings or destruction of other structures or features on the ‘Local List’ will be resisted to the extent of powers available…” Conservation Officers have also stated that:  “…this is precisely the sort of building the Local List was intended to identify and protect; it is also exactly the type of building which contributes to ‘local distinctiveness’.” Members of the committee, it is elected representative that our citizens look to to protect their interests. I therefore urge you to do just that and set aside the recommendation and reject this application”.

Published January 24th, 2008

Much wants more

Tesco have taken out a lease on the premises presently occupied by the Golf Shop in Robin Hood Lane and plan to open a Tesco Metro there. Amongst many other reasons why this is undesirable is that access for bulk deliveries is totally inadequate and lorries already damage adjoining properties (and councillors had to have double height kerbstones installed to protect the central reservation). At the approach to a pedestrian crossing, there is very little parking that must also serve the other businesses and there is a potential hazard to pedestrians.

Three convenience stores in the vicinity already serve the local community very well and are now threatened by this possible development. We already have the Somerfield and Waitrose stores as full supermarkets and one Tesco already on the edge of Hall Green. There are also good local stores in Baldwins Lane, on Hall Green Parade, at Robin Hood Island and elsewhere. We don’t need any more, but it appears that Tesco does, regardless of the impact on the local community and established businesses. Councillor Michael Wilkes has presented two petitions totalling 800 signatures and, with colleagues, has written a strong objection as have numerous local residents. Tesco have more than enough already. Despite the weakness and bias towards applicants in national planning law, we must do all we can to see that this application gets thrown out.

Please support your local traders!

Published January 18th, 2008

Making companies act with integrity

It’s sometimes asserted that nationalisation of Northern Rock should be opposed because competition from a state owned bank would be unfair to the rest. But an effect on the rest is precisely what is needed.

The financial barrow boys who misled so many, abusing the integrity suggested by ‘Northern’ and the solidity implied by ‘Rock’, are not alone. NR is just an example of the unprincipled way in which private sector financial outfits now operate.

‘Competition’ has come to mean little more than competition for maximum profit by whatever means. These include misusing the loyalty of longstanding - usually elderly - savers by slipping them into derisory rates of interest and acting as an unconstituted cartel by holding back, in whole or in part, on reductions in bank rate and delaying responses to those who should benefit from changes up or down.

Creeping cartelisation is a feature of other so-called competitive industries too - witness power companies managing their latest price hikes. Regulators range from inadequate to useless and consumer groups complain into the ether but are powerless. Unmitigated ‘competition’, meaning little more than an economic free-for-all, is passing its sell by date.

But there is a way of making these and other industries heed the public interest and behave with integrity. If each of these sectors had a publicly owned firm acting as an exemplar, treating people in a respectful, honest and straightforward fashion rather than merely as profit fodder this would introduce competition that is worthwhile to society as a whole. It would offer security and fairness to ordinary people, presently suffering relentless abuse by commercial predators.

Whatever happens to NR, as I’ve suggested elsewhere in a Birmingham context there would be no better place to start than with the recreation of a Municipal Bank - in so far as the Government would still allow a fully fledged Municipal Bank to operate in a meaningful way.

Published January 3rd, 2008

Hip Hip Hooray? No Way

As if house buyers and sellers were not struggling enough, the Government introduced the Home Information Pack. This scheme is so badly thought out that the original start date had to be revised for smaller properties and the HIP introduction for larger properties was sneakily brought in in the autumn with virtually no publicity. What is a HIP? The basic ‘pack’ consists of local searches, title deeds and an energy efficiency report, so the only thing that would not already have been provided to a would-be purchaser is the energy efficiency report. This informs the purchaser if there is adequate loft insulation, double glazed windows, cavity wall insulation, an energy efficient boiler etc. in other words, nothing that purchasers could not find out by using their eyes and asking a few simple questions. The energy efficiency rating can be changed by something as simple as swapping ordinary light bulbs for energy efficient ones, making a nonsense of the whole thing. The cost of a HIP is upwards of £350 for the seller, which is likely to be added to the asking price of the property. In addition, buyers are advised to obtain their own local searches just to be ‘on the safe side.’ HIPs are a total waste of time and money, just what we have come to expect from this Labour Government.